We also plan it in two ways: 1. Users managed in nopCommerce - we will create provider for Umbraco 2. Users will manages in Umbraco in regular way, we will add field that stores Customer Id in nopCommerce
2. All data like text, images of product and categories managed in Umbraco, (item connected by Id from nopCommerce) price and attributes manages by nopCommerce.
Does this mean that each product will have a node in the Umbraco content tree?
Pages - All routes manage by Umbraco, ids from Nop
1. Categories list - http://test-umbraco.uteam-dev.com/categories 2. Category - http://test-umbraco.uteam-dev.com/category/2 - route by id for now 3. Product - http://test-umbraco.uteam-dev.com/product/6 - route by id, image is base64 - will be replaced with regular image 4. Shopping Cart - http://test-umbraco.uteam-dev.com/shopping-cart/ all cart saved in Nop 5. Register http://test-umbraco.uteam-dev.com/register/ - all data saved in Nop
second option (all data managed in Umbraco and connected to Nop by id) will be release at next week
Sharing some useful links would be also very helpful. For example, this one (although very old)
Hey all,
I work for a major share trading platform and we integrated Unbraco some years back and quickly found that constant calls to the backend (and I'm talking about large load balanced servers, now across AWS and Amazon) were slow considering the amount of content involved. We ended up using handlers to sync the data and resources locally on startup if they were out of date of sync. I assume most people here are running a single IIS instance and DB on the save server, however I think any design should be able to cater for large scaled out installations.