Hi,
We are running Nop 1.6 and are wondering if checkout attributes were ever implemented and if so, how do we enable them. We need to be able to put "Special Instructions" in the checkout process. Better yet, we would be able to name them, or add multiple checkout attributes, such as "For (first name)", "for (last name)", etc.
Let me know if this is doable, or if we need to upgrade, and how we go about implementing this
Thanks a ton!
Ben
Nevermind! I found it. It's under /administration/checkoutattributes.aspx
Perfect! Thanks for adding this functionality!
nopCommerce 1.6 roadmap. Let's discuss.
MVP
- 741
- 8299
- 9/14/2010
- United States
I just wanted to let everyone know in this forum that Pre-order support is still on the roadmap for a future release:
Please go and vote for this task here
Please go and vote for this task here
- 79
- 463
- 1/5/2014
- Belgium
a.m. wrote:
Hi Andrei,
Did Quickbooks actually been integrated in nopcommerce over the past years?
Don't see any feature regarding this.
Thx for any response!
Best regards Bart
We've prepared a roadmap for the next version of nopCommerce (1.60). It's just a draft. Please let us know your thoughts.
- Catalog (categories, products etc) localization
- Individual prices can be specified for individual customer groups
- Allow customers to enter price
- Configurable checkout attributes (such as 'Accept terms' or 'Enter custom message')
- Reward Points System
- Configurable customer attributes (such as 'date of birth', 'phone number')
- More analytics and reporting
- More SEO friendly
- Batch product editing
- Backend order editing
- Products sorting (front end)
- Product tags
- AliPay (China) payment method testers needed
- Social bookmarking
- Full-text search
- Google Websire optimizer integration
- Performance optimization
- QuickBooks intergration
- Improved Google Checkout payment method
- 3D Secure / Verified by Visa
- Configure email sender per message template
- DHL shipping method
- Backend order creation
- Bundled products
- Pre-order support
- A lot of minor enhancements
- Catalog (categories, products etc) localization
- Individual prices can be specified for individual customer groups
- Allow customers to enter price
- Configurable checkout attributes (such as 'Accept terms' or 'Enter custom message')
- Reward Points System
- Configurable customer attributes (such as 'date of birth', 'phone number')
- More analytics and reporting
- More SEO friendly
- Batch product editing
- Backend order editing
- Products sorting (front end)
- Product tags
- AliPay (China) payment method testers needed
- Social bookmarking
- Full-text search
- Google Websire optimizer integration
- Performance optimization
- QuickBooks intergration
- Improved Google Checkout payment method
- 3D Secure / Verified by Visa
- Configure email sender per message template
- DHL shipping method
- Backend order creation
- Bundled products
- Pre-order support
- A lot of minor enhancements
Hi Andrei,
Did Quickbooks actually been integrated in nopcommerce over the past years?
Don't see any feature regarding this.
Thx for any response!
Best regards Bart
MVP
Silver Solution Partner
- 5236
- 49485
- 10/4/2010
- Mexico
bart.m84 wrote:
In v1.x there used to be an integration, and now there are plugins for that.
Hi Andrei,
Did Quickbooks actually been integrated in nopcommerce over the past years?
Don't see any feature regarding this.
Thx for any response!
Best regards Bart
Did Quickbooks actually been integrated in nopcommerce over the past years?
Don't see any feature regarding this.
Thx for any response!
Best regards Bart
In v1.x there used to be an integration, and now there are plugins for that.
- 174
- 1361
- 4/14/2011
- Ukraine
Sorry for the offtopic question, I really have no intent of trolling your conversation, this is not meant in any way to be offending, I am just curious.
I always wanted to know what are the reasons for someone sticking to an old version of any software that has been updated at least a dozen of times. (features added, bugs removed, and all this for free). Sorry, I can't stand it anymore to pretend being wise enough to understand it. :-)
btw. I have to admit, I am the other extreme: I do manually run 'check for updates' regularly on my computer, even on software that I have not been using recently, just to keep my machine tidy.
I always wanted to know what are the reasons for someone sticking to an old version of any software that has been updated at least a dozen of times. (features added, bugs removed, and all this for free). Sorry, I can't stand it anymore to pretend being wise enough to understand it. :-)
btw. I have to admit, I am the other extreme: I do manually run 'check for updates' regularly on my computer, even on software that I have not been using recently, just to keep my machine tidy.
MVP
Certified Developer
- 3944
- 35207
- 2/8/2010
- Australia
I have a bunch of different versions running going back over 9 years of being a nopCommerce developer.
One site I am still running version 1.7 because it was heavily customised for one customer and would take a lot of work (maybe months) to reintegrate all their changes and features into the latest version.
That implementation still suits their purposes for a fixed community of over 2500 users. Version 1.7 was the first move to ASP.NET 4.0 and Entity framework 4.0 so it still runs pretty good even today, although it would be nice for the site to be responsive and utilise new technologies.
I am definitely thinking of upgrading their site (if they can find the funds), in fact some of the developments we originally carried out have now appeared in the latest versions so it would be a little easier.
Although as said there would be months of integration of existing code and interfaces then testing as well as data conversion to utilise version 4.
I’m no expert on all the new ways and methods, plugins are getting there but it still seems not so easy to overload a bunch of different code and interfaces without hacking the existing code, whilst at the same time still making it easy to upgrade into the future 😉
One site I am still running version 1.7 because it was heavily customised for one customer and would take a lot of work (maybe months) to reintegrate all their changes and features into the latest version.
That implementation still suits their purposes for a fixed community of over 2500 users. Version 1.7 was the first move to ASP.NET 4.0 and Entity framework 4.0 so it still runs pretty good even today, although it would be nice for the site to be responsive and utilise new technologies.
I am definitely thinking of upgrading their site (if they can find the funds), in fact some of the developments we originally carried out have now appeared in the latest versions so it would be a little easier.
Although as said there would be months of integration of existing code and interfaces then testing as well as data conversion to utilise version 4.
I’m no expert on all the new ways and methods, plugins are getting there but it still seems not so easy to overload a bunch of different code and interfaces without hacking the existing code, whilst at the same time still making it easy to upgrade into the future 😉